<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: MAC&#8217;s DazzleGlass vs. Sally Hansen&#8217;s Lipnotic Gem Gloss</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bitbythebeautybug.com/2008/07/09/macs-dazzleglass-vs-sally-hansens-lipnotic-gem-gloss/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bitbythebeautybug.com/2008/07/09/macs-dazzleglass-vs-sally-hansens-lipnotic-gem-gloss/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Aug 2010 06:15:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: sarahPUFFY!</title>
		<link>http://bitbythebeautybug.com/2008/07/09/macs-dazzleglass-vs-sally-hansens-lipnotic-gem-gloss/comment-page-1/#comment-881</link>
		<dc:creator>sarahPUFFY!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 23:01:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bitbythebeautybug.com/?p=795#comment-881</guid>
		<description>I have all shades of the gloss, and they all have enough pigment for me. I find it comparable to Hourglass&#039;s Extreme Sheen, but with more shimmer. Maybe it&#039;s just me, but I don&#039;t find Dazzleglass to be anything special.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have all shades of the gloss, and they all have enough pigment for me. I find it comparable to Hourglass&#8217;s Extreme Sheen, but with more shimmer. Maybe it&#8217;s just me, but I don&#8217;t find Dazzleglass to be anything special.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
